Civil Disobedience as a Movement - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1109 Downloads: 7 Date added: 2019/05/16 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Civil Disobedience Essay Did you like this example? During the years the most important events in the world, have started by someone who raised their voice on an injustice, a conflict, a disagreement. This referring to changes and improvements for a society, protests are all over the history and until now the still being an important cause of change, even for good or bad. But there are many opinions if either is a good behavior or not, if it follows the laws or break them. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Civil Disobedience as a Movement" essay for you Create order Society involves different groups and cultures, from here is that the disagreements start, because communities have different opinions and want to be heard, if it were not for those who claim their rights, there would be no egalitarian justice. Protests not only raise awareness, but it also raise rejection for those who interpret it as a criminal conduct and an infraction of law; and to be honest there will always be a thin line between crime and civil disobedience. Protests shouldnt be qualified as crimes, they are an important step to changes and rights, if they are made with reciprocity nobody can deny the right of a group or person to raise their voice, society went trough so many improvements for people because of this kind of civil disobediences and there are many factors to judged this movements as civil disobedience. In a society exists different groups and cultures, ruled by a hegemony class and constituting of subculture and counterculture, therefore subordinated groups need to be represented and not be an indifferent part of society. Hegemony is the ruling class in a society, which maintains effective control over some subject group, the models of society imposed by a ruling elite, named the upper class. The influence generated in other social groups comes from the hegemony class, through this hegemony is added a trace of power, influence and hierarchy; hegemony is the sociocultural political articulation mode that imposes, reaffirms and recreates the dominant power in economy, politics and culture. Culture being the general group identity, also involves sub-cultures being a part of the larger culture, is a sub-division that results from the combination of factors such as social class, ethnic, beliefs, practices, and values. Sub-cultures are an important influence around the hegemony, domination and resistance: the search of disagreement with hegemonic ideas, attitudes and values that distance itself from the dominant and parental culture. In relation with this the counterculture is a subculture that represent the evolution of expressions cultural alternatives to a system, it establishes limits to the hegemonic, formulate questions, generates a movement from the smaller groups against the most influential groups in a society.The best system of government is known as Democracy, in which management and ownership resides in the power of the total society as whole, but the relationship between democracy and culture is controversial and thorny issue. Politician and their parties use the cultures to gain their votes, but beyond the good intentions that everyone announces, we discover politicians have the intentions to manipulate cultural spaces and to use its people. Subcultures and countercultures of a society arent the majority rule, even democracy is the voice of the people, some groups and people are more influential and have the power to decide, this because people choose their representatives and that is sometimes the main problem. Smaller groups dont have much power in democracy, pure democracy care for majority, and not for subordinated groups, devoting very little attention to political subcultures and its development, which is an indicator of the existing levels of freedom. To judge a conduct from a subordinated group is essential to know the reason and the meaning it has for them, what it may be right for one group can be completely rejected for the members of another, and vice versa. This is better explained in Rachels critique of cultural relativism, to call something right or wrong would imply being able to judge such a custom from an independent point of view to personal opinion. Rachel doesnt agree with universal critique, he talk s about a case of the different cultures with different moral codes, King Darius of Persia confronted two peoples, Greeks and Calatinos, with each others funeral habits. Greeks were disgusted with the funeral practice of the Catalans, of eating the dead. Calatinos disliked the habit of burning them on the funeral pyre, as the Greeks did. Confronting them, Dario seems to have given them a lesson in tolerance. Now in the contemporary world, there are still differences between cultures and is difficult to present objective reasons to say that one particular behavior is better or worse than other; there are no universal moral truths. Using Rachels critique is possible to judge protest actions in order to accept them as a good argument and respect the right to present their reasons in relation to their context.Protests were made to generate attention, for this they are made in public spaces, not matter where, the space and people must be respected and be done in a way that doesnt affect others. If is a justifiable illegality or not, is judged from the reciprocity presented, to raise awareness manifestations are expressed, then, in all the artistic tendencies, social, philosophical and scientific. All this understood at a specific time and circumstances, within the social, economic, political and cultural coordinates of th eir time; context without which social phenomena would not take place (or took on completely different forms). Inconvenience will always appear in protests, for those who disagree with the reason or just the methods employed, some ways of protests can be uncomfortable for society, but interventions can mean the end of something genuine and the beginning of a movement that responds to the demands of a particular class, never attempting against someone or something and stay in the range of justifiable infraction. In conclusion for all this reasons and examples to justify civil disobedience as an act to be heard and considerate in a society. Classifying the socio-cultural phenomenon of the protests, the one that has been banalized so many times and that has scarcely been analyzed from a criminalistic point of view. Once the existence of the subculture is admitted as a phenomenon loaded with values different from those of the dominant or central culture, our duty is to identify them, classify them and analyze how they differ from those of the dominant culture, in order to determine if these values †¹Ã¢â‚¬ ¹are or are not, tolerated differences that do not represent a social threat. For without the establishment of democracy and its air of freedom, as well as its apparent security, experiential expressions such as those promoted by the subcultures would hardly have taken place.

Three things that happened in m life, and push me to stude Free Essays

What is that challenge? How is work? Is that something I can stay home and it will come over to me? Is that something I can befit because my parents have it? My explanation about challenge could be different but I think it will work. Challenge is always people dreams but most do not complete it Challenge is your dream, is something you want died for, you sacrifice our life for You believe in, you spend all your time for, you borrow money for, you cut in your sleep for, and onetime you don’t sleep for, First is work! When you want, when you decide to sacrifice you life for it, and will see how work is. No is not something you can stay home and it will come to you, is something you go looking for, no matter how bad it is outside no matter how bad the whether is you wake up with it in you head and get out looking for it, no matter how hard everything is for you go looking for it. We will write a custom essay sample on Three things that happened in m life, and push me to stude or any similar topic only for you Order Now No challenge is not something you could be befit from any parents, our parents could e rich and gives you whatever you want, you still need to know you need challenge , our parents can give you most time they have doesn’t mean anything, you can have to put yourself out and looking for challenge Just like I did. Remember challenge is go back to school, or if you already at school fit for it, spend all your time on it, always have an your mine why you wake up early for? Why would you go to school for? Why would you do anything Jobs to survive? Why would you need to spend a lot of time in school for? Don’t forget how much money you loose if you spend four years in college, and could save that money and go to work making more money, always ask yourself why would you do that for, and keep going in school you will see it, you will understand it, you will satisfy it, you will love it, you will say this is how challenge work. No matter how long it will take you , no matter how hard it is to do your homework, no matter how late you been , no matter how bad your grade is don’t give up. How to cite Three things that happened in m life, and push me to stude, Papers

Obeying the Law an Example of the Topic All Posts by

Obeying the Law An obligation to obey the law involves a reason to do that which the law needs. However the converse does not hold. Numerous reasons to do that which the law needs have nothing to do with an obligation to obey the law. One has reasons not to kill, assault, rape, or imprison other people which have no association with the law and depend completely on the fact that such acts are against the will or interests or (moral) rights of others. Thus far such reasons are reasons to do that which the law requires, for the law requires abstaining from murder, assault, rape, and imprisonment. The obligation to obey the law entails that the reason to do that which is required by law is the very fact that it is so required. At the very least this must be part of the reason to obey. (Kent Greenawalt, 1989) Need essay sample on "Obeying the Law" topic? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you Proceed It is easy to find numerous examples where the fact that the law requires an act is a reason to perform it. A person possibly expelled from school or loses his job if rumours that he broke the law become known to his headmaster or employer. His criminal act(s) may to a great extent afflict his much-loved parents or spouse, etc. Such thoughts do not even tend to demonstrate that there is an obligation to obey the law. For even though in these cases the law is a reason for conforming behavior it is an incidental reason existing for a particular person, applying under definite special circumstances. The obligation to obey the law is a general obligation applying to all the law's subjects and to all the laws on all the occasions to which they apply. To look for an obligation to obey the law of a definite country is to look for grounds which make it enviable, further things being equal, that one must always do as the law requires. These grounds require not be the same for everyone or for every occasion, however they must be of adequate generality in order that a few general sets of considerations will apply to all on all occasions. The hunt for an obligation to obey the law of a certain country is an inquiry into whether there is a set of true premises which involve that everyone should always to do as those laws require and which comprise the fact that those actions are required by law as a non-redundant premises. Liberal political theory generally assumes that an obligation to obey the law implies nothing more than a prima facie reason to obey. The notion of an obligation, however, imports a practical requirement more stringent than that of a prima facie reason. An action is obligatory merely if it is required by a protected reason which does not derive only from the fact that adherence to it eases realization of the agent's goals. No doubt one may be satisfied with inquiring whether or not there is a prima facie reason to obey the law which applies to all the law's subjects on all occasions to which the law applies. It is recommended that even in this 'modest' sense there is no obligation to obey the law. However it is of interest to note that for the majority people an obligation to obey the law means something far more demanding than a prima facie reason. It means a peremptory reason best explained consistent with general analysis of obligation, as a categorical protected reason. The occur rence of this 'strong' view of an obligation to obey,far from resting on naive and unreflective political attitudes, reflects a logical and sober understanding of necessary features of the political situation which has long been expediently overlooked by most political theorists. The query of the proper attitude to the law is a central preoccupation of political philosophy. One facet of it is the inquiry whether there is an obligation to fulfill with the claims of the law for obedience, whether one has a duty to obey the law as it that is the law, demands to be obeyed. It is this obligation which is usually thought of by the general public as the obligation to obey the law. Quite apart from this terminological point there can be little doubt of the significance of an inquiry into whether it is justified to comply with the claims of the law for obedience. The law's claims for obedience are very diverse from the current philosophical conception of the obligation to obey the law as a prima facie reason to obey. The majority of the current philosophical writings assume that the obligation to obey the law is not violated when an offence is committed in circumstances where there are strong moral reasons for committing it although its commission is accountable to lead to a conviction in a court of law. One can imagine, for instance, unlawfully obtaining or stealing a medicine essential to cure a patient and which for a variety of reasons cannot be lawfully obtained. Clearly such an act is a violation of an obligation to obey the law if that is understood as an obligation to obey the law as it requires to be obeyed. On that understanding any act which is a breach of law is as well a violation of the obligation to obey the law. Two points are involved here. The first is that through its rules and its adjudicative machinery the law supposes the right to find out in what conditions legal requirements are defeated by other considerations. The courts apply various doctrines for instance conscientious objection, self-defence, necessity, etc., to pardon people from blame for breach of law. Moderately prosecutorial discretion is designed, in certain countries, to serve the same purpose. So that at the same time as it is true that legal requirements are not, in law, absolute, the law itself claims to determine their proper import, to fix the conditions in which they are overridden. Consequently, an obligation to obey the law interpreted as a 'strong' obligation, i.e. to obey it as it requires to be obeyed, comprises acknowledging more than a prima facie reason to obey the law. It includes admission that the reasons to obey have the weight and implications which the law determines for them. In other words it involve s a reason to obey in all situation defeated only by considerations which are legally documented as excusing from prosecution or conviction. (Kent Greenawalt, 1989) This may sound like claiming that the obligation to obey the law is absolute. Although, and here is the second point, this is a mistake. The essay on 'The Claims of Law' provided arguments for holding that the law claims not absolute however exclusionary status. Courts need not refute the weight of moral reasons which sometimes argue for breaking the law but which are not provided for by the law and are not permitted to count as excuses or justifications. But the courts do maintain that neither they nor the individual are entitled to break the law on such occasions. They assert that one should disregard those countervailing considerations, however weighty. The legislator or the executive may have to take some action. Although so long as they have not done so the individual should disregard those countervailing considerations. In other words the law asserts that its rules and rulings are authoritative. To found an obligation (in the strong sense) to obey the law, as commonly understoo d, is to institute that its claim is justified, that the law indeed has the legitimate authority it claims to have. The view that there is no obligation to obey the law in a country with a good and just legal system has the air of inconsistency. Its inconsistent appearance is accountable to a large degree for our reluctance to abandon the belief in the existence of such an obligation. The appearance of paradox is deceptive. It stems from two intimately connected sources: we think of a decent or a moral citizen as one who among other things obeys the laws of a just legal system and we think of the good legal system as the one whose laws ought to be obeyed. A couple of preliminary points first. It goes without saying that one has more often independent ethical reasons for conforming to the laws of a good legal system than to those of a bad legal system. If a legal system is ethically good then it holds morally good laws and those are often laws prescribing behavior which is morally obligatory independently of the law. One has moral reasons to act in conformity with the laws of a good system more often than with those of a bad system even if there is no special moral obligation to obey the laws of a just legal system. It is as well true that the fact that a legal system is in general good and just is a reason to trust its law-making and judicial institutions. If one knows that generally the laws are such that one has independent moral reasons to do as they require, then with respect to any individual law one has, other things being equal, motive to believe that there is independent moral reason to conform to it too. Consequently the general moral quality of the system heartens conformity by being a reason to believe and trust the moral value of each individual law. Again no particular obligation to obey the law is involved. These two points, though, do not touch on the essence of the apparent paradox: how is it that the fact that a legal system is just is not a reason to obey it. To dispel the appearance of paradox one has to believe the necessary role of the law in society. It is true that sometimes it is quite appropriately said that a law which is usually disregarded should be repealed. And if it is recognized in advance that a law, if made, will be generally disregarded, then it must not be made. But such arguments depend on existing or predictable disregard for the law ensuing from the failure of any kind of consideration to secure conformity. They cannot be cited as evidence that it is usually thought that where legal sanctions are unproductive or improbable to be effective then there should not be law. however if this is not a common belief then though lawfully provided sanctions are beyond doubt an important legal technique, they are not usually thought to be the only one. There are in actual fact two fundamental legal techniques, two ways in which the law serves its functions. One is the provision of reasons for compliance through the stipulation of sanctions. The other is the marking, in a publicly ascertainable way, of standards required by the organized society. In the first technique the law makes reasons for conformity, in the second it relies on independent reasons and invokes and directs them by openly declaring definite standards as the proper ones to be followed by all who are aggravated by those invoked reasons. The independence of the second technique is often overlooked. It appears that the fact that legal standards are publicly ascertainable is readily explained by the need to provide a publicly ascertainable standard for the sanction technique to be efficient and fair. It has, however, to be pointed out that this is not the merely role of publicly ascertainable standards. Consider the law regulating the activities of courts and other hig h-ranking state officers. Admittedly these officers are generally directly or indirectly connected with the application of legal sanctions. But the legal standards addressed to such officials are not there merely to allow others to predict how the officials will act but chiefly to guide the officials themselves. But while it is proposed that the officials will conform to the law, it is not expected that they should do so through desire to avoid the sanctions, but for the reason that they are predisposed by independent considerations to obey the law. The law's role here is only to mark clearly the standards to which that independent motivation then attaches itself. This difference between the two legal techniques can be viewed as a reinterpretation of the traditional distinction between mala per se and mala prohibita. One role the law has is to forbid and punish the performance of acts which must not be performed for independent reasons which neither depend on the existence of law nor are concerned with preserving further social practices. Since some people fail to be motivated by those independent reasons as they must be, the law provides them through its sanctions with alternative reasons. A second role belonging to the law concerns participation in schemes of social co-operation. Thus the law is good if it offers prudential reasons for action where and when this is advisable and if it marks out certain standards as socially required where it is suitable to do so. If the law does so correctly then it reinforces protection of ethically valuable possibilities and interests and encourages and supports worthwhile forms of social co-operation. But neither of these legal techniques even when estimably used gives rise to an obligation to obey the law. It makes sense to judge the law as a helpful and significant social institution and to judge a legal system good or even just right while denying that there is an obligation to obey its laws. Reference: Kent Greenawalt, Conflicts of Law and Morality; Oxford University Press, 1989

Tricky Masculine Nouns in German

Tricky Masculine Nouns in German German is a pretty rule-heavy language but as with any rules, there are always exceptions. In this article, well dive into masculine nouns that have irregular endings. Masculine Nouns Ending in e Most German nouns ending in -e are feminine. But there are some very common e-ending masculine nouns - sometimes referred to as weak nouns. Many of them derived from adjectives. Here are a few common examples: der alte: old mander beamte: civil servantder deutsche: male Germander Franzose: Frenchmander fremde: strangerder gatte: male spouseder kollege: colleagueder kunde: customerder junge: boyder riese: giantder verwandte: relative Almost all such masculine nouns ending in -e (der Kse being a rare exception) add an -n ending in the genitive and plural. They also add an -n ending in any case other than the nominative - for example, the accusative, dative, and genitive cases (den/dem kollegen, des kollegen). But there are a few more variations on this ending theme. Some Masculine Nouns Add ens in the Genitive Another small group of German masculine nouns ending in -e requires an unusual ending in the genitive case. While most German masculine nouns add -s or -es in the genitive, these nouns add -ens instead. This group includes​: der  name/des namens: of the nameder glaube/des glaubens: of the beliefder buchstabe/des buchstabens: of the letter, referring to the alphabetder friede/des friedens: of the  peaceder funke/des funkens: of the sparkder same/des samens: of the seedder wille/des willens: of the  will Masculine Nouns Referring to Animals, People, Titles, or Professions This group of common masculine nouns includes some that end in -e (der là ¶we, lion), but there are also other typical endings: -ant (der kommandant), -ent (der prsident), -r (der br), -t (der architekt). As you can see, these German nouns often resemble the same word in English, French, or other languages. For nouns in this group, you need to add an -en ending in any case other than the nominative: Er sprach mit dem Prsidenten. (dative) Nouns That Add -n, -en   Some nouns add an n, en, or another ending in any case other than the nominative.   (AKK.) Kennst du den Franzosen? Do you know the Frenchman? (DAT.) Was hat sie  dem  Jungen  gegeben? What did she give the boy? (GEN.) Das ist der Name des Herrn. Thats the gentlemans name. Other Irregular German Masculine Nouns Endings shown are for (1) the genitive/accusative/dative and (2) the plural. der alte:  old man (-n, -n)der architekt:  architect (-en, -en)der automat: vending machine (-en, -en)der br  bear: (-en, -en) Often  des brs  in informal genitive usage.der bauer:  farmer, peasant; yokel (-n, -n)der beamte:  civil servant (-n, -n)der bote:  messenger (-n, -n)der bursche:  boy, lad; fellow, guy (-n, -n)der Deutsche:  male German (-n, -n)der einheimische:  native, local (-n, -n)der erwachsene:  adult (-n, -n)der Franzose: Frenchman (-n, -n)der fremde:  stranger (-n, -n)der fà ¼rst:  prince (-en, -en)der  gatte:  male spouse (-n, -n)der gefangene:  prisoner (-n, -n)der gelehrte:  scholar (-n, -n)der graf:  count (-en, -en)der heilige:  saint (-n, -n)der held:  hero (-en, -en)der herr:  gentleman, lord (-n, -en)der hirt:  herdsman (-en, -en)der kamerad:  comrade (-en, -en)der  kollege:  colleague (-n, -n)der kommandant:  commander (-en, -en)der kunde:  customer (-n, -n)der là ¶we:  lion; Leo (astrol.) (-n, -n)d er mensch:  person, human being (-en, -en)der nachbar:  neighbor (-n, -n) Often the -n ending is only used in the genitive singular. der junge:  boy (-n, -n)der kse:  cheese (-s, -)  The plural is usually  ksesorten.der planet:  planet (-en, -en)der prsident:  president (-en, -en)der prinz:  prince (-en, -en)der riese: giant (-n, -n)der soldat:  soldier (-en, -en)der tor:  fool, idiot (-en, -en)der verwandte:  relative (-n, -n) A final comment about these special masculine nouns. In common, everyday German (casual versus more formal register), the genitive -en or -n endings are sometimes replaced by an -es or -s. In some cases, the accusative or dative endings are also dropped.

3 pasos para renovar sin entrevista la visa de turista

3 pasos para renovar sin entrevista la visa de turista La renovacià ³n de la visa de turista para Estados Unidos puede hacerse siguiendo un trmite rpido y sencillo siempre que se realice dentro de plazo. En este artà ­culo se informa sobre quià ©nes no necesitan la visa de turista y por lo tanto no precisan renovarla. Tambià ©n cundo se tiene que renovar, si se tiene una, cà ³mo es el proceso, quà © 3 decisiones puede tomar el oficial consular y quà © no se debe hacer porque pone en peligro la visa y/o su renovacià ³n. Con esta informacià ³n ser fcil obtener la renovacià ³n del visado. Quià ©nes no necesitan una visa de turista para ingresar a Estados Unidos Es importante saber que las personas extranjeras que desean viajara a Estados Unidos como turistas o para recibir tratamiento mà ©dico necesitan de una visa B2 o la combinacià ³n de una B1/B2 de turista/negocios, si bien existen importantes excepciones: Mexicanos y extranjeros residentes en Mà ©xico que viven junto a la frontera pueden solicitar una tarjeta de cruce, tambià ©n conocida como visa lser. Pero sà ³lo sirve para un tiempo ms limitado que la visa de turista y tambià ©n est restringida a ingresos terrestres y no permite adentrarse ilimitadamente en territorio de los Estados Unidos.CanadiensesCiudadanos de 38 paà ­ses parte del Programa de Exencià ³n de Visas.   Entre esos 38 paà ­ses se encuentran, entre otros, Espaà ±a, Chile, Italia y Portugal, lo cual puede ser de interà ©s para muchos latinoamericanos que cuentan con doble nacionalidad, siendo una de ellas la de un paà ­s incluido ese ese Programa de Exencià ³n de Visas. Cundo es necesario renovar la visa de turista Si ya se tiene una visa de turista, conocida en algunos paà ­ses como de paseo o de placer, à ©sta tiene una vigencia limitada. Puede dejar de ser vlida porque se aprueba por un nà ºmero limitado de ingresos y estos ya se han agotado o porque ya ha llegado su fecha de expiracià ³n (tambià ©n conocida como de vencimiento). En cualquiera de estos casos es necesario renovar la visa si se quiere viajar de nuevo a los Estados Unidos. El proceso es muy similar a los de peticià ³n por primera vez, pero con dos importantes novedades: el porcentaje de aprobacià ³n es mucho ms alto en las renovacionesen  algunos  casos no es necesaria la entrevista en el consulado. Estas circunstancias se han endurecido desde que el presidente Donald Trump entrà ³ en la Casa Blanca. 3 trmites para la renovacià ³n de la visa de turista americana Deben seguirse los siguientes pasos: En primer lugar, completar en là ­nea el documento DS-160.  La opcià ³n que aplica es la de visa renewal. Aunque el formulario est en inglà ©s, es posible ver una traduccià ³n al espaà ±ol colocando el cursor encima del texto que se quiere traducir. En segundo lugar, pagar la cuota correspondiente. El procedimiento de pago tiene variaciones de paà ­s a paà ­s por lo que se debe seguir las instrucciones del DS-160. Esta tarifa nunca se regresa, aunque la visa no sea aprobada. En tercer lugar, si es necesario cerrar una cita para la entrevista en la oficina consular, seguir el procedimiento. Si no es obligatorio, proceder a entregar la documentacià ³n como se seà ±ala en el formulario de internet.   Casos de exencià ³n de la entrevista para renovar la visa de turista americana La entrevista en el consulado o embajada es uno de los trmites que ms disgusta a los solicitantes de las visas de turista. Una de las razones es porque la necesidad de presentarse en el edificio consular obliga a dedicar buena parte de una maà ±ana a ese trmite o incluso ms, si hay que desplazarse a otra ciudad. Pero adems, hay el factor subjetivo de los nervios. No todas las persona se ponen nerviosas, pero muchas sà ­, por no saber quà © le van a preguntar, por temor a dar una respuesta equivocada, etc. Por todo ello, la posibilidad de no tener que acudir a la entrevista es festejado por muchos solicitantes de la renovacià ³n de la visa. El  Programa de Exencià ³n de la Entrevista, conocido por sus siglas en inglà ©s de  IWP, que establecià ³ paulatinamente el gobierno del presidente Barack Obama permità ­a muchos casos de renovacià ³n sin necesidad de entrevista. Sin embargo, el  Ã‚  Donald Trump ha anulado esa waiver en muchos casos. Actualmente, estos son los lineamientos para no tener que presentarse a la entrevista durante la tramitacià ³n de la visa de turista americana: Nià ±os de 6 aà ±os o menoresPersonas mayores de 80 aà ±osPersonas cuya visa de turista haya expirado hace menos de 12 meses y que nunca hayan tenido problemas en las aduanas de EE.UU., nunca hayan sido detenidas y a las que nunca se les haya negado o anulado una visa americana. En todos los casos, las embajadas y consulados de Estados Unidos pueden decidir unilateralmente que un solicitante debe presentarse a la entrevista aà ºn cuando entre dentro de las excepciones que en teorà ­a permitirà ­an no tener que cumplir con ese propà ³sito. Quà © puede suceder durante el proceso de  renovacià ³n de la visa El oficial consular puede decidir: aprobar la visadeclarar un procedimiento administrativo, es decir, ni aprobacià ³n ni negacià ³nNegar la visa. ​ Las posibilidades de que esto suceda son pequeà ±as, ya que en los casos de renovacià ³n se produce menos de un dos por ciento de rechazo de entre todas las solicitudes. Pero sà ­ que es una posibilidad real. No obstante, es mucho menor a lo que sucede cuando se solicita por primera vez, donde el rechazo en general supera el 20 por ciento de las peticiones, si bien hay grandes diferencias segà ºn el consulado. Las causas por las que se produce un rechazo caen bsicamente dentro de dos grandes categorà ­as, causas que convierten a una persona en inelegible para la visa de turista y las que la convierten en inadmisible para ingresar a los Estados Unidos.   Si el problema se origina por una de estas à ºltimas causas, es aconsejable asesorarse con un abogado de inmigracià ³n especialista en waivers para analizar si es conveniente solicitar uno. A esto tambià ©n se le conoce como perdones o permisos. Quà © puede poner en peligro conservar la visa de turista Para evitar problemas muy desagradables e incluso sufrir la cancelacià ³n de la visa es conveniente saber la respuesta correcta a estas dos preguntas:  ¿es conveniente quedarse en EEUU el mximo tiempo permitido? En este punto es de extrema importancia conocer las consecuencias, ya que desde el punto de vista migratorio son graves. Adems, es importante saber  con quà © frecuencia se puede regresar  a Estados Unidos como turista ya que la mayorà ­a de los viajeros no son conscientes de que el ingreso a EE.UU. les puede ser negado por un oficial migratorio aunque, en teorà ­a, estn movià ©ndose dentro de los parmetros que marca la ley. Para mayor informacià ³n sobre cà ³mo obtener y conservar la visa, se recomienda tomar este  este quiz, trivial o test sobre visas. Este artà ­culo tiene una finalidad informativa. No es asesorà ­a legal para ningà ºn caso en particular.

Applying Balanced Scorecard Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Applying Balanced Scorecard - Assignment Example Businesses were faced by unclear situations of distinguishing an important aspect from what is not. Kaplan and Norton stated that the important aspects of a business should be presented in a balanced way. A balanced scorecard has three basic components that are important. They include strategic management framework, measurement system and communication tools (Blokdijk, 2008). The banking industry, greatly benefits from the balanced scorecard and management system. The BSC system helps managers in the banking sector accomplish the institution’s objectives. The major scorecard perspectives that can be implemented by managers are better-quality customer service and efficiency in the internal business processes (Blokdijk, 2008 p 113). Banks strategies are always based on the customer and therefore with improved customer service, the bank will end up improving on its profits, sales and turnovers. Banking industries are also able to improve by ensuring that they have efficient business processes. Blokdijk (114) states that with efficiency in the internal business processes, a banking industry will be able to retain its customers. With retained customers, the financial returns go up and the thus improvement in the

Aid in dying or physician assisted suicide Research Paper

Aid in dying or physician assisted suicide - Research Paper Example Those who have opted to take a neutral stand believe that while physician assisted suicide may be unethical in some cases; there are certain cases that may warrant the doctor to take the necessary action to end the life of his or her patient. This is especially in cases where the patient himself demands that a doctor ends his life because it has become unbearable because of the pain they are enduring in their terminal illness. The legal and moral debate is currently going on and it seems that the stands that have been taken on the opposite sides of the debate are going to be reconciled any time soon. A brief discussion of the issues involved in physician assisted suicide needs to be discussed in order to come up with a suitable stand concerning the matter. Background There have developed strong arguments concerning the loosening of the legal constraints that prevent doctors from administering physician-assisted suicide to their patients. Surveys that have been conducted recently have shown that many people of the United States are in favor of the legalization of this practice.1 Those opposed to it are the conservative elements of the society such as religious people as well as moral conservatives who tend to equate the practice to murder. It should however be realized that some form of legalization of the practice is eventually going to be made because many people will most likely leave behind instructions concerning their being assisted to die in case something serious happens to them. It will no longer matter what the government and conservatives elements in society will have to say because the wishes of individuals will most likely be put first. There has, recently been a high prevalence in the number of people who have made requests to their doctors to have assistance with suicide. The doctors have to consider this difficult request because of the legal and ethical repercussions of the practice.2 It can safely be said that there is a high likelihood that ma ny doctors accede to the demand of their patients, although secretly, and assist them in ending their lives. Despite it being illegal, especially in the United States, the possibilities of physician-assisted suicides taking place in the country are quite high. Such acts are most likely going to force the legalization of assisted suicides so that the government can have some measure of control over it. Analysis Among the arguments that have been made concerning the banning of physician, assisted suicide is that it is wrong in the eyes of God. The greatest opposition to the legalization of this practice has come from the religious establishment and religious texts and opinions have been used to justify its stand. It has been stated that only God has the ultimate power to take away life, and that doctors who assist their patients in dying are committing a sin.3 This argument has been strongly countered by advocates of physician-assisted suicide, who have stated that God is not so aloof that he allows people to suffer immense pain. Instead, they have argued that God has given human beings the knowledge and the ability to get rid of pain, and that among the means that God has provided is that of physicians assisting their patients to receive a